From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wilson v. Moore

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Sep 8, 2000
767 So. 2d 1246 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

Opinion

Case No.: 1D99-1187

Opinion filed September 8, 2000.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County. John E. Crusoe, Judge.

Alexander C. Wilson, pro se.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General and Caryl Kilinski, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.


Alexander C. Wilson appeals the dismissal of his petition for writ of habeas corpus. The trial court's dismissal was based on appellant's failure to comply with paragraphs four and six of the trial court's Case Management Order enforcing the requirement of section 57.085(7), Florida Statutes (1997), a provision of the Prisoner Indigency Statute. InJackson v. Florida Dep't of Corrections, 25 Fla. L. Weekly S353, 354 (Fla. May 4, 2000), the Florida Supreme Court determined that section 57.085(7) is unconstitutional as a violation of the separation of powers and a usurpation of the court's exclusive rulemaking authority. Accordingly, the trial court's dismissal must be reversed. Upon remand, the trial court is directed to determine whether, even though appellant's petition is styled as one seeking habeas corpus relief, it should be viewed as a petition for writ of mandamus. See Woullard v. Bishop, 734 So.2d 1151 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999).

We note that no filing fees are necessary to obtain a writ of habeas corpus. Art. I, § 13, Fla. Const.

REVERSED and REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

JOANOS, LAWRENCE AND VAN NORTWICK, JJ., CONCUR.


Summaries of

Wilson v. Moore

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Sep 8, 2000
767 So. 2d 1246 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)
Case details for

Wilson v. Moore

Case Details

Full title:ALEXANDER C. WILSON, Appellant, v. MICHAEL W. MOORE, et al., Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Sep 8, 2000

Citations

767 So. 2d 1246 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

Citing Cases

Rowe v. State

We have previously held that dismissal of a petition for writ of mandamus for noncompliance with section…