From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wilson v. Mercado

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 5, 2023
1:22-cv-00278-ADA-SAB (PC) (E.D. Cal. Jun. 5, 2023)

Opinion

1:22-cv-00278-ADA-SAB (PC)

06-05-2023

DAVID WAYNE WILSON, Plaintiff, v. GABINO MERCADO, et al., Defendants.


ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO TERMINATE ACTION PURSUANT TO PARTIES' STIPULATION FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL

(ECF NO. 54)

On June 2, 2023, the parties filed a stipulation to dismiss this action with prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, as the case has been resolved in its entirety. (ECF No. 54.)

Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) provides in pertinent part that, “the plaintiff may dismiss an action without a court order by filing . . . a stipulation of dismissal signed by all parties who have appeared. A voluntary stipulation to dismiss an action pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) automatically terminates the action without operation of a court order.” Black Rock City, LLC v. Pershing Cty. Bd. of Comm'rs, 637 Fed.Appx. 488 (9th Cir. 2016) (citing Commercial Space Mgmt. Co. v. Boeing Co., 193 F.3d 1074, 1077 (9th Cir. 1999)). Here, Plaintiff and counsel for Defendants have signed and dated a stipulation to dismiss this action, and filed it with the Court.

In light of parties' stipulation for voluntary dismissal, this action is dismissed with jrejudice. Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). Each party is to bear its own litigation costs and ittorney's fees.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Wilson v. Mercado

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 5, 2023
1:22-cv-00278-ADA-SAB (PC) (E.D. Cal. Jun. 5, 2023)
Case details for

Wilson v. Mercado

Case Details

Full title:DAVID WAYNE WILSON, Plaintiff, v. GABINO MERCADO, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jun 5, 2023

Citations

1:22-cv-00278-ADA-SAB (PC) (E.D. Cal. Jun. 5, 2023)