From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wilson v. Kijakazi

United States District Court, Middle District of North Carolina
Mar 18, 2022
1:20CV562 (M.D.N.C. Mar. 18, 2022)

Opinion

1:20CV562

03-18-2022

DAVID WILSON, Plaintiff, v. KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Defendant.


ORDER

THOMAS D. SCHROEDER UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

On February 14, 2022, the United States Magistrate Judge's Recommendation was filed and notice was served on the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. Plaintiff filed objections (Doc. 29) within the time limit prescribed by Section 636 and Defendant responded (Doc. 30).

The court has reviewed Plaintiff's objections de novo and finds that they do not change the substance of the United States Magistrate Judge's Recommendation (Doc. 27), which is affirmed and adopted.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Commissioner's decision finding no disability is AFFIRMED, that Plaintiff's Motion to Reverse the Decision of the Commissioner (Doc. 17) is DENIED, that Defendant's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (Doc. 21) is GRANTED, and that this action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.


Summaries of

Wilson v. Kijakazi

United States District Court, Middle District of North Carolina
Mar 18, 2022
1:20CV562 (M.D.N.C. Mar. 18, 2022)
Case details for

Wilson v. Kijakazi

Case Details

Full title:DAVID WILSON, Plaintiff, v. KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Middle District of North Carolina

Date published: Mar 18, 2022

Citations

1:20CV562 (M.D.N.C. Mar. 18, 2022)