From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wilson v. Humphey

United States District Court, S.D. West Virginia, Beckley Division
Mar 10, 2006
Civil Action No. 5:05-cv-00795 (S.D.W. Va. Mar. 10, 2006)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 5:05-cv-00795.

March 10, 2006


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER


Pending before the court is the petitioner's motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 for Writ of Habeas Corpus By a Person in State Custody. This action was referred to the Honorable R. Clarke VanDervort, United States Magistrate Judge, for submission to this court of proposed findings of fact and recommendation for disposition, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). The Magistrate Judge has submitted findings of fact and recommended that the court dismiss Petitioner's first, second and fourth grounds for relief and direct Petitioner within twenty days from entry of this Order to file an Amended § 2254 Petition containing only exhausted claims.

Neither party has filed objections to the Magistrate Judge's findings and recommendation.

Accordingly, the court ADOPTS and incorporates herein the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, and ORDERS that the Petitioner's first, second, and fourth grounds for relief be DISMISSED. The court also DIRECTS the petitioner to file an Amended § 2254 Petition containing only exhausted claims by April 3, 2006.

The court DIRECTS the Clerk to send a certified copy of this Order to Magistrate Judge VanDervort, counsel of record, and any unrepresented party.


Summaries of

Wilson v. Humphey

United States District Court, S.D. West Virginia, Beckley Division
Mar 10, 2006
Civil Action No. 5:05-cv-00795 (S.D.W. Va. Mar. 10, 2006)
Case details for

Wilson v. Humphey

Case Details

Full title:SALLY J. WILSON, Petitioner, v. DALE HUMPHEY, Warden, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, S.D. West Virginia, Beckley Division

Date published: Mar 10, 2006

Citations

Civil Action No. 5:05-cv-00795 (S.D.W. Va. Mar. 10, 2006)

Citing Cases

Elswick v. Plumley

Stay and abeyance is only appropriate in limited circumstances in which the district court determines that…

Clement v. Ballard

Stay and abeyance is only appropriate in limited circumstances in which the district court determines that…