From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wilson v. Gelarie

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 9, 1981
80 A.D.2d 850 (N.Y. App. Div. 1981)

Opinion

March 9, 1981


In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for misrepresentation in connection with the sale of real property, defendants Gelarie, Goldstein, Schwartz and F T Goldstein Realty Company appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated March 19, 1980, which denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as against them. Order reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, and motion granted. The specific disclaimer clause contained in the parties' contract of sale precludes the purchasers from now claiming that they relied upon any of the appellants' alleged misrepresentations (see Wittenberg v. Robinov, 9 N.Y.2d 261; Danann Realty Corp. v. Harris, 5 N.Y.2d 317). Titone, J.P., Gibbons, O'Connor and Thompson, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Wilson v. Gelarie

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 9, 1981
80 A.D.2d 850 (N.Y. App. Div. 1981)
Case details for

Wilson v. Gelarie

Case Details

Full title:DOUGLAS J. WILSON et al., Respondents, v. JUDITH A. GELARIE et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 9, 1981

Citations

80 A.D.2d 850 (N.Y. App. Div. 1981)

Citing Cases

Most v. Monti

It is well established that a general "boiler-plate" merger clause is ineffective to preclude judicial…

London v. Courduff

It is not a standard form. It specifies the items and fixtures which it includes and those which it excludes.…