Opinion
786 CA 21-01555
11-10-2022
Thomas C. WILMOT, Sr., Thomas C. Wilmot, Jr., and Loretta W. Conroy, Plaintiffs-Respondents-Appellants, v. Tony KIRIK, Defendant-Appellant-Respondent, and County of Monroe, Defendant-Respondent-Appellant.
ROSENHOUSE LAW FIRM, ROCHESTER (MICHAEL A. ROSENHOUSE OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT-RESPONDENT. HARRIS BEACH PLLC, PITTSFORD (H. TODD BULLARD OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS-APPELLANTS. JOHN P. BRINGEWATT, COUNTY ATTORNEY, ROCHESTER (ADAM M. CLARK OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.
ROSENHOUSE LAW FIRM, ROCHESTER (MICHAEL A. ROSENHOUSE OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT-RESPONDENT.
HARRIS BEACH PLLC, PITTSFORD (H. TODD BULLARD OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS-APPELLANTS.
JOHN P. BRINGEWATT, COUNTY ATTORNEY, ROCHESTER (ADAM M. CLARK OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.
PRESENT: LINDLEY, J.P., NEMOYER, WINSLOW, BANNISTER, AND MONTOUR, JJ.
ORDER
It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in the decision at Supreme Court.