From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wilmington Savings Fund Soc'y v. Moran

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Sep 24, 2019
175 A.D.3d 1196 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)

Opinion

9878 Index 850291/17

09-24-2019

WILMINGTON SAVINGS FUND SOCIETY, FSB, doing Business as Christiana Trust, not Individually but as Trustee for Hilldale Trust, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Trevor C. MORAN, Defendant-Respondent, Board of Managers of 120 Riverside Blvd at Trump Place, et al., Defendants.

Friedman Vartolo LLP, New York (Zachary Gold of counsel), for appellant. Rozario & Associates, P.C., New York (Rovin R. Rozario of counsel), for respondent.


Friedman Vartolo LLP, New York (Zachary Gold of counsel), for appellant.

Rozario & Associates, P.C., New York (Rovin R. Rozario of counsel), for respondent.

Sweeny, J.P., Richter, Kapnick, Kern, Singh, JJ.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Judith N. McMahon, J.), entered December 14, 2018, which denied plaintiff's motion for summary judgment on its foreclosure complaint, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and the motion granted.

Plaintiff established its standing to foreclose on the mortgage by attaching to the complaint a copy of the mortgage, a copy of the note, on which is it undisputed that defendant defaulted, and a copy of the mortgage assignment (see Bank of N.Y. Mellon v. Knowles, 151 A.D.3d 596, 57 N.Y.S.3d 473 [1st Dept. 2017] ). Contrary to defendant Moran's contention, plaintiff was not required to submit proof that the note, as well as the mortgage, was assigned ( id. at 596–597, 57 N.Y.S.3d 473 ).

Plaintiff established its compliance with RPAPL 1304 by submitting copies of the required default and 90–day foreclosure notices with an affidavit by the loan servicer's foreclosure specialist stating, based upon her review of the loan servicer's records, that the notices were mailed to defendant in accordance with the provisions of the statute (see Deutsche Bank Natl. Trust Co. v. Al Rasheed, 169 A.D.3d 532, 92 N.Y.S.3d 637 [1st Dept. 2019] ; Bank of Am., N.A. v. Brannon, 156 A.D.3d 1, 8, 63 N.Y.S.3d 352 [1st Dept. 2017] ).

In opposition, defendant failed to raise an issue of fact.


Summaries of

Wilmington Savings Fund Soc'y v. Moran

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Sep 24, 2019
175 A.D.3d 1196 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)
Case details for

Wilmington Savings Fund Soc'y v. Moran

Case Details

Full title:Wilmington Savings Fund Society, FSB, doing business as Christiana Trust…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Sep 24, 2019

Citations

175 A.D.3d 1196 (N.Y. App. Div. 2019)
2019 N.Y. Slip Op. 6716
106 N.Y.S.3d 857

Citing Cases

U.S. Bank v. Russell

Plaintiff established its prima facie entitlement to judgment of foreclosure by showing that it had physical…

U.S. Bank N.A. v. Hossain

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Judith Reeves McMahon, J.), entered October 17, 2018, which, upon the…