From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Willis v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Oct 1, 2003
855 So. 2d 263 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

Opinion

Case No. 4D03-25.

Opinion filed October 1, 2003.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Moses Baker, Jr., Judge; L.T. Case No. 02-26192 MMA02.

Frank A. Kreidler, Lake Worth, for appellant.

Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Tallahassee, and David M. Schultz, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.


After the appellant made a threatening comment to a witness during the lunch break from a trial, the court commenced a contempt proceeding, took testimony, and held appellant in contempt of court without complying with any of the provisions of Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.840, regarding indirect criminal contempt. Failure to comply with the procedural requirements of this rule is error. See Baker v. Green, 732 So.2d 6, 7 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999). We therefore reverse the order of contempt.

STONE, WARNER and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.

NOT FINAL UNTIL DISPOSITION OF ANY TIMELY FILED MOTION FOR REHEARING.


Summaries of

Willis v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Oct 1, 2003
855 So. 2d 263 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)
Case details for

Willis v. State

Case Details

Full title:NATHOLEE WILLIS, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Oct 1, 2003

Citations

855 So. 2d 263 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

Citing Cases

Van Hare v. Van Hare

Failure to comply with the procedural requirements of this rule is reversible error. Willis v. State, 855…