From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Willis v. Fink

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 3, 2004
7 A.D.3d 519 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)

Opinion

2003-06851.

Decided May 3, 2004.

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Grays, J.), dated June 13, 2003, which granted the plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability.

Agen Stenz, Westbury, N.Y. (Stuart M. Kurland of counsel), for appellant.

Ornstein Ornstein, P.C., Brooklyn, N.Y. (Stuart R. Lang of counsel), for respondents.

Before: A. GAIL PRUDENTI, P.J., DAVID S. RITTER, HOWARD MILLER, THOMAS A. ADAMS, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiffs established their entitlement to judgment as a matter of law on the issue of liability by demonstrating that the defendant, who either failed to stop at a stop sign or, upon stopping, failed to yield the right of way to the plaintiffs' vehicle, was the sole proximate cause of the accident ( see Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1142; Szczotka v. Adler, 291 A.D.2d 444; McClelland v. Seery, 261 A.D.2d 451; Gravina v. Wakschal, 255 A.D.2d 291; Maxwell v. Land-Saunders, 233 A.D.2d 303). In opposition, the defendant failed to submit evidence sufficient to raise a triable issue of fact ( see Lupowitz v. Fogarty, 295 A.D.2d 576; Bolta v. Lohan, 242 A.D.2d 356).

PRUDENTI, P.J., RITTER, H. MILLER and ADAMS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Willis v. Fink

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 3, 2004
7 A.D.3d 519 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
Case details for

Willis v. Fink

Case Details

Full title:SHA-RALL WILLIS, ET AL., respondents, v. JOHN C. FINK, appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 3, 2004

Citations

7 A.D.3d 519 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
775 N.Y.S.2d 587

Citing Cases

Ward v. Press

The defendant has established a prima facie entitlement to summary judgment by tendering evidence…

Sukhu v. Marajh

Here, plaintiffs made the requisite prima facie showing of their entitlement to summary judgment both by…