From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Willis v. Bldg. Serv. Employees Int'l, L. 262, Div. 196

The Supreme Court of Washington. En Banc
Nov 25, 1964
396 P.2d 884 (Wash. 1964)

Opinion

No. 37363.

November 25, 1964.

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Clallam County, No. 15357, Max Church, J., entered July 12, 1963. Affirmed.

Action for injunctive relief. Defendants appeal from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff.

Gordon L. Walgren, for appellants.

Severyns Moffett, for respondents.



Appellants appeal from an order enjoining them from picketing respondents' place of business. Appellants' counsel concedes that if the findings of fact entered by the trial court find substantial support in the evidence the appeal fails. Thorndike v. Hesperian Orchards, Inc., 54 Wn.2d 570, 343 P.2d 183 (1959). No question of law is presented or urged.

We have carefully reviewed the testimony contained in the statement of facts. While there is testimony supporting the contentions of both sides, the trial court accepted the testimony presented by respondents which, in turn, supports the findings of fact to which error is assigned. Since we do not retry disputed issues of fact upon appeal, the judgment of the trial court must be affirmed.

Respondents will recover their costs.


Summaries of

Willis v. Bldg. Serv. Employees Int'l, L. 262, Div. 196

The Supreme Court of Washington. En Banc
Nov 25, 1964
396 P.2d 884 (Wash. 1964)
Case details for

Willis v. Bldg. Serv. Employees Int'l, L. 262, Div. 196

Case Details

Full title:JAMES R. WILLIS et al., Respondents, v. BUILDING SERVICE EMPLOYEES…

Court:The Supreme Court of Washington. En Banc

Date published: Nov 25, 1964

Citations

396 P.2d 884 (Wash. 1964)
65 Wash. 2d 947
65 Wn. 2d 947

Citing Cases

Pullman Co. v. State

" Finding of fact No. 3. [1, 2] We recognize, of course, that findings supported by substantial evidence…