From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williamson v. Cowan

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Dec 23, 2010
49 So. 3d 867 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

Opinion

No. 5D09-4119.

December 23, 2010.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Orange County, Janet C. Thorpe, Judge.

Michael M. Williamson, Long Beach, California, pro se.

No Appearance for Appellee.


Michael M. Williamson, Appellant, challenges the lack of findings in the trial court's modified final judgment for dissolution of marriage to impute income for child support purposes following his layoff from Boeing Satellite Systems. Instead, the final judgment found the increase in income earned by Wendy T. Cowan, Appellee, constituted the substantial change of circumstances warranting the modification of child support. The record does not include a hearing transcript to assist our review.

Because Appellant never challenged the adequacy of the findings in a motion for rehearing, we determine that the issue was not properly preserved for appellate review. See Mathieu v. Mathieu, 877 So.2d 740, 741 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004). Accordingly, we affirm.

AFFIRMED.

LAWSON and EVANDER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Williamson v. Cowan

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Dec 23, 2010
49 So. 3d 867 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)
Case details for

Williamson v. Cowan

Case Details

Full title:Michael M. WILLIAMSON, Appellant, v. Wendy T. COWAN a/k/a Wendy T…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: Dec 23, 2010

Citations

49 So. 3d 867 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

Citing Cases

Pensacola Beach Pier, Inc. v. King

Secondly, they did not file a motion to clarify whether the court's conclusion applied to those statements or…

New Hampshire Indem. Co. v. Gray

See, e.g., Pensacola Beach Pier, Inc. v. King, 66 So.3d 321, 325–26 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011) (holding, where…