From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williamson v. Bullington

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Apr 1, 2001
353 N.C. 363 (N.C. 2001)

Opinion

No. 432A00

Filed 6 April 2001

Appeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals, 139 N.C. App. 571, 534 S.E.2d 254 (2000), vacating summary judgment entered 4 March 1999 by Gore, J., in Superior Court, Brunswick County, and remanding with instructions to the trial court to allow plaintiff the opportunity to amend her pleadings. Heard in the Supreme Court 14 February 2001.

Brooks, Pierce, McLendon, Humphrey Leonard, L.L.P., by William P.H. Cary and Jessica M. Marlies, for plaintiff-appellant.

Rountree Seagle, L.L.P., by George Rountree, III, and Charles S. Baldwin, IV; and Frink, Foy Yount, P.A., by Henry G. Foy, for defendant-appellee.


Justice EDMUNDS did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case. The remaining members of this Court were equally divided, with three members voting to affirm the decision of the Court of Appeals and three members voting to reverse. Therefore, the decision of the Court of Appeals is left undisturbed and stands without precedential value. See Reese v. Barbee, 350 N.C. 60, 510 S.E.2d 374 (1999); Nesbit v. Howard, 333 N.C. 782, 429 S.E.2d 730 (1993).

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Williamson v. Bullington

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Apr 1, 2001
353 N.C. 363 (N.C. 2001)
Case details for

Williamson v. Bullington

Case Details

Full title:LaDANE WILLIAMSON v. LAURA M. BULLINGTON, Individually and as Executrix of…

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Apr 1, 2001

Citations

353 N.C. 363 (N.C. 2001)
544 S.E.2d 221

Citing Cases

Southwood v. Solution

First, the plaintiff must have owned the property in question. Lake Mary Ltd. P'ship v. Johnston, 145 N.C.…

Price v. City of Winston-Salem

Accordingly, the decision of the Court of Appeals is left undisturbed and stands without precedential value.…