From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. Young

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA LAKE CHARLES DIVISION
Mar 6, 2012
DOCKET NO. 2:11 CV 1826 (W.D. La. Mar. 6, 2012)

Opinion

DOCKET NO. 2:11 CV 1826

03-06-2012

HOWARD WILLIAMS v. JOE P. YOUNG


JUDGE MINALDI


MAGISTRATE JUDGE KAY


JUDGMENT

For the reasons contained in the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge filed previously herein, noting the absence of objections thereto, and concurring with the Magistrate Judge's findings under the applicable law;

IT IS ORDERED that the respondent's Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the petition for writ of habeas corpus is DENIED and DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

THUS DONE AND SIGNED, in chambers, Lake Charles, Louisiana, on this March, 2012.

______________

PATRICIA MINALDI

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Williams v. Young

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA LAKE CHARLES DIVISION
Mar 6, 2012
DOCKET NO. 2:11 CV 1826 (W.D. La. Mar. 6, 2012)
Case details for

Williams v. Young

Case Details

Full title:HOWARD WILLIAMS v. JOE P. YOUNG

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA LAKE CHARLES DIVISION

Date published: Mar 6, 2012

Citations

DOCKET NO. 2:11 CV 1826 (W.D. La. Mar. 6, 2012)