From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. Westchester Street Railroad Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 1, 1918
183 App. Div. 948 (N.Y. App. Div. 1918)

Opinion

April, 1918.

Present — Jenks, P.J., Thomas, Mills, Putnam and Kelly, JJ.


The curve in defendant's tracks was accurately measured. It ended and was succeeded by a line of straight track for about 600 feet to the electric light pole where the front of the car stopped just after the accident. It is, therefore, demonstrated that where plaintiff fell from the rear platform was over 500 feet beyond and past this curve. While there was testimony that the car rounded the curve unusually fast, and then swayed and jerked in its course there, there was no sufficient proof of any unusual movement of the car at the later time when plaintiff fell off, or stepped off, after the car had begun to slow down under the stopping bell. The learned trial court, therefore, rightly set aside the verdict as contrary to law and against the weight of the evidence. Order directing a new trial unanimously affirmed, with costs.


Summaries of

Williams v. Westchester Street Railroad Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 1, 1918
183 App. Div. 948 (N.Y. App. Div. 1918)
Case details for

Williams v. Westchester Street Railroad Company

Case Details

Full title:JAMES E. WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. WESTCHESTER STREET RAILROAD COMPANY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 1, 1918

Citations

183 App. Div. 948 (N.Y. App. Div. 1918)

Citing Cases

Karbank Holdings, LLC v. Reg'l Evangelical All. of Churches

("The debt and the liability of the mortgagor are not the same thing in law, and the mortgage is not…