From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. Wasco State Prison

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 13, 2015
CASE NO. 1:14-cv-01714-MJS (PC) (E.D. Cal. Jul. 13, 2015)

Opinion

CASE NO. 1:14-cv-01714-MJS (PC)

07-13-2015

LANCE WILLIAMS, Plaintiff, v. WASCO STATE PRISON, et al., Defendants.


ORDER DIRECTING PRISON TO PRODUCE INFORMATION TO ASSIST IN IDENTIFYING JOHN DOE DEFENDANTS

(ECF No. 16)

I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Plaintiff, Lance Williams, is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff has consented to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction.

On May 13, 2015, the Court found that Plaintiff had stated cognizable medical indifference claims against two John Doe correctional officers and ordered Plaintiff to identify documents that would enable him to ascertain their identities. (ECF No. 12.) Plaintiff filed a subpoena and declarations in response. (ECF No. 13.) The Court requested Plaintiff to resubmit the subpoena after narrowing its scope and clarifying its contents. (ECF No. 14.) Plaintiff's amended subpoena, filed June 17, 2015 (ECF No. 16), is now before the Court. The Court will treat it as a motion for discovery and respond accordingly.

II. Request for Identification of Correctional Officers

Plaintiff provides descriptions of the two male John Doe correctional officers who are defendants in this action:

1. John Doe 1 was on duty on D-Yard, Building No. 4, working B-Side cell No. 236 between lights out on April 5, 2014 and dawn on April 6, 2014. Plaintiff describes him as either white or Hispanic, between 5'9" and 6' tall, either balding or having white or grey hair.

2. John Doe 2 was on duty on D-Yard, Building No. 4, working B-Side, cell No. 236 during the second-watch shift between 6 a.m. and 8 a.m. on April 6, 2014. Plaintiff describes John Doe 2 as "older," short, white or Hispanic.

These descriptions clearly suffer from a lack of specificity. However, that shortcoming is compensated in part by the limited number of individuals who likely were on duty at that place during the times specified. Ruling out women, African-Americans, and men more than six feet in height, should narrow the list further.

To enable this legitimate inquiry to proceed, the Court hereby Orders Defendants to provide to the Court, for its in camera review, a list of all correctional officers who fall within the above criteria. Upon receipt, the Court will give the parties notice if and how it determines the inquiry may reasonably and productively proceed.

In addition, Defendants shall provide to the Court for its in camera review any log entries, grievances, medical request forms, or any other complaints, forms or notations pertaining to Plaintiff on April 5 and 6, 2014, his fall from the bunk, and the injuries he suffered as a result; and a list of correctional officers who signed, authored, or otherwise approved or confirmed the accuracy of reports identifying them as individals possibly having knowledge of the Doe Defendants' response to Plaintiff's cell on April 5th and 6th, 2014.

III. Contact Information of Inmate Dozier and Parolee Kelly

Plaintiff has declared under penalty of perjury that to his belief Inmate Dozier, CDC # AR-9431, at one time housed in D-Yard, Building 4, A-Side, cell No. 122 and Parolee Jerry Kelly, Plaintiff's former cellmate in D-Yard, Building 4, B-Side, cell No. 236, were witnesses to Plaintiff's interactions with Does 1 and 2 on April 5-6, 2014 and could help identify them.

Defendants shall forthwith, and in no event later than 21 days from the date of this Order, provide to Plainitff Dozier's current contact information, the name of Kelly's parole officer, and Kelly's last known contact information. This Order does not relieve Plaintiff of his obligations to ensure compliance with the procedures for inmate contact with a parolee or other inmate under Cal. Code Regs., tit. 15 § 3139.

IV. CONCLUSION & ORDER

Accordingly, the Court HEREBY ORDERS:

1. Plaintiff's requests for information (ECF No. 16) are granted in part;

2. Wasco State Prison is directed to provide, for the Court's in camera review:

a. the names of any correctional officers meeting Plaintiff's description;

b. any log entries, grievances, or other forms pertaining to Plaintiff's fall from his bunk or the Doe Defendants' response to Plaintiff's cell on April 5 and 6, 2014;
c. the names of any correctional officers identified as witnesses to or having knowledge of the Doe Defendants' response to Plaintiff's cell on April 5 and 6, 2014; and

3. Wasco State Prison is directed to provide Plaintiff with the contact information of Inmate Dozier and Parolee Kelly.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 13, 2015

/s/ Michael J . Seng

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Williams v. Wasco State Prison

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 13, 2015
CASE NO. 1:14-cv-01714-MJS (PC) (E.D. Cal. Jul. 13, 2015)
Case details for

Williams v. Wasco State Prison

Case Details

Full title:LANCE WILLIAMS, Plaintiff, v. WASCO STATE PRISON, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jul 13, 2015

Citations

CASE NO. 1:14-cv-01714-MJS (PC) (E.D. Cal. Jul. 13, 2015)