From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. Vonderau

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Dec 7, 2007
362 N.C. 76 (N.C. 2007)

Opinion

No. 18A07.

Filed December 7, 2007.

Appeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals, 181 N.C. App. 18, 638 S.E.2d 644 (2007), dismissing as moot an appeal from an order entered 25 August 2005 by Judge Shelly S. Holt in District Court, New Hanover County. Heard in the Supreme Court 12 April 2007.

James E. Williams, pro se, plaintiff-appellee. Bruce Mason and Associates, by James F. Rutherford and Bruce A. Mason, for defendant-appellant.


On the issue of whether more than one incident of harassment is required before a trial court can enter a civil no-contact order under N.C.G.S. § 50C-1(6), the members of the Court are equally divided, with three members voting to affirm and three members voting to reverse. Accordingly, the decision of the Court of Appeals is affirmed without precedential value. See State v. Harrison, 360 N.C. 394, 627 S.E.2d 461 (2006); Crawford v. Commercial Union Midwest Ins. Co., 356 N.C. 609, 572 S.E.2d 781 (2002).

The decision of the Court of Appeals that an appeal related to a civil no-contact order is moot once the order expires is reversed. See In re A.K., 360 N.C. 449, 628 S.E.2d 753 (2006).

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART.

Justice HUDSON did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.


Summaries of

Williams v. Vonderau

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Dec 7, 2007
362 N.C. 76 (N.C. 2007)
Case details for

Williams v. Vonderau

Case Details

Full title:JAMES WILLIAMS v. CHRISTOPHER VONDERAU

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Dec 7, 2007

Citations

362 N.C. 76 (N.C. 2007)

Citing Cases

Ramsey v. Harman

         N.C. Gen.Stat. § 50C-1(6) has only once been interpreted by this Court. SeeWilliams v. Vonderau, 181…

Ramsey v. Harman

N.C. Gen. Stat. § 50C-1(6) has only once been interpreted by this Court. See Williams v. Vonderau, 181 N.C.…