From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. U.S.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Jan 18, 1985
485 A.2d 950 (D.C. 1985)

Opinion

Nos. 81-928, 81-929.

Argued May 16, 1984.

Decided January 18, 1985. Rehearing En Banc of 470 A.2d 302.

Sebastian K.D. Graber, Alexandria, Va., for appellant.

Judith Hetherton, Asst. U.S. Atty., Washington, D.C. with whom Joseph E. diGenova, U.S. Atty. and Michael W. Farrell, Asst. U.S. Atty., Washington, D.C., were on brief, for appellee.

John P. Dwyer, Washington, D.C. with whom James Klein, Washington, D.C. was on brief, for amicus curiae Public Defender Service.

Before PRYOR, Chief Judge, and NEBEKER, MACK, NEWMAN, FERREN, BELSON, and ROGERS, Associate Judges, and PAIR and KERN, Associate Judges, Retired.

Judge KERN was an Associate Judge of the court at the time of argument. His status changed to Associate Judge, Retired, on May 25, 1984. He did not participate in the decision of this case.


ORDER


It is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the judgment on appeal is affirmed by an evenly divided court.

So Ordered.


Summaries of

Williams v. U.S.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Jan 18, 1985
485 A.2d 950 (D.C. 1985)
Case details for

Williams v. U.S.

Case Details

Full title:Scotty A. WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Appellee

Court:District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Date published: Jan 18, 1985

Citations

485 A.2d 950 (D.C. 1985)

Citing Cases

United States v. Hamid

Rule 35 was later amended to comport with what appellee contends was the pre- Nunzio practice that motions…

Lawrence v. United States

After the case was reheard, the judgment of the trial court was affirmed by an equally divided en banc court,…