From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. State

Court of Appeals of Alabama
Jun 30, 1936
169 So. 337 (Ala. Crim. App. 1936)

Opinion

6 Div. 961.

May 19, 1936. Rehearing Denied June 30, 1936.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Marion County; Ernest Lacy, Judge.

John Williams and Flint Parker were each convicted of unlawfully possessing a still, and they appeal.

Affirmed.

C. E. Mitchell, of Hamilton, for appellant.

A. A. Carmichael, Atty. Gen., for the State.


The indictment was in two counts, one charging the manufacture of whisky, and the other the unlawful possession of a still, etc. The verdict was general and referable to either count in the indictment. Haney v. State, 19 Ala. App. 79, 95 So. 57.

The evidence for the state was sufficient to justify a verdict of guilt, and, while the testimony of the defendants was to the contrary, the question was for the jury.

Other exceptions have been examined, and we find them all free from error.

The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Williams v. State

Court of Appeals of Alabama
Jun 30, 1936
169 So. 337 (Ala. Crim. App. 1936)
Case details for

Williams v. State

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAMS et al. v. STATE

Court:Court of Appeals of Alabama

Date published: Jun 30, 1936

Citations

169 So. 337 (Ala. Crim. App. 1936)
27 Ala. App. 227