From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Oct 28, 1959
329 S.W.2d 284 (Tex. Crim. App. 1959)

Opinion

No. 30931.

October 28, 1959.

Appeal from the County Court at Law, Potter County, Mary Lou Robinson, J.

Harris E. Lofthus, Amarillo, for appellant.

Leon B. Douglas, State's Atty., Austin, for the State.


The offense is resisting arrest; the punishment, a fine of $200.

The statement of facts before us contains the testimony of only three witnesses and is not approved as a statement of all the facts adduced upon the trial. For this reason, we are not in a position to pass upon the sufficiency of the evidence to support the conviction or the legality of the arrest of the appellant, which are the matters raised in the appellant's brief. See Dominguez v. State, 164 Tex.Crim. R., 303 S.W.2d 384, and Stockman v. State, 164 Tex.Crim. R., 303 S.W.2d 410.

Finding no reversible error, the judgment is affirmed.


Summaries of

Williams v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Oct 28, 1959
329 S.W.2d 284 (Tex. Crim. App. 1959)
Case details for

Williams v. State

Case Details

Full title:P. M. WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. STATE of Texas, Appellee

Court:Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Date published: Oct 28, 1959

Citations

329 S.W.2d 284 (Tex. Crim. App. 1959)

Citing Cases

Slater v. State

For the same reason we cannot appraise appellant's claim that the court erred in overruling his motion for…