From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Apr 4, 1991
576 So. 2d 1375 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

Opinion

No. 90-989.

April 4, 1991.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Marion County; William T. Swigert, Judge.

James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Michael S. Becker, Asst. Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Anthony J. Golden, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, for appellee.


We affirm the conviction and sentence in this case except that we reverse and strike the order requiring restitution because the record shows the theft victim recovered the stolen television and we reverse and strike the award of court costs imposed without notice and hearing. See Wood v. State, 544 So.2d 1004 (Fla. 1989); Harriel v. State, 520 So.2d 271 (Fla. 1988); Burgess v. State, 569 So.2d 829 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990); McMahon v. State, 561 So.2d 1284 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990); Clark v. State, 560 So.2d 264 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990).

AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part.

COWART, GRIFFIN and DIAMANTIS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Williams v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Apr 4, 1991
576 So. 2d 1375 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)
Case details for

Williams v. State

Case Details

Full title:CHARLIE WILLIAMS, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: Apr 4, 1991

Citations

576 So. 2d 1375 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)