From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Mar 1, 1983
427 So. 2d 331 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)

Opinion

No. 81-2044.

March 1, 1983.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Dade County, Gerald Kogan, J.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Scherman Zelonker and Regina Zelonker, Sp. Asst. Public Defenders, for appellant.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen. and Diane Leeds and Carolyn Snurkowski, Asst. Attys. Gen., for appellee.

Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and HUBBART and NESBITT, JJ.


The final judgment of conviction and sentence under review is reversed and the cause is remanded for a new trial. First, we think the jury instruction on flight was improperly given in this case because there was insufficient evidence that the defendant fled the scene to avoid prosecution. Williams v. State, 378 So.2d 902 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980); Barnes v. State, 348 So.2d 599 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977). Second, we think that the state was improperly allowed to cross-examine the defendant as to matters falling within the attorney-client privilege, which error we cannot say was harmless within the context of this case. Roberts v. Jardine, 366 So.2d 124 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979).

Reversed and remanded for a new trial.


Summaries of

Williams v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Mar 1, 1983
427 So. 2d 331 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)
Case details for

Williams v. State

Case Details

Full title:DEBRA WILLIAMS, APPELLANT, v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Mar 1, 1983

Citations

427 So. 2d 331 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)

Citing Cases

Lefevre v. State

To support the flight instruction, the record must at the least indicate not only that the accused left the…

Fenelon v. State

See, e.g., Wright, 586 So.2d at 1030. ("Merely fleeing the scene of a crime does not support a flight…