From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. State

Florida Court of Appeals, First District
Mar 22, 2023
358 So. 3d 818 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2023)

Opinion

No. 1D22-1956.

03-22-2023

Herman P. WILLIAMS Jr., Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

Herman P. Williams Jr., pro se, Petitioner. Ashley Moody , Attorney General, and Trisha Meggs Pate , Bureau Chief, Tallahassee, for Respondent.


Herman P. Williams Jr., pro se, Petitioner.

Ashley Moody , Attorney General, and Trisha Meggs Pate , Bureau Chief, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.

Because the trial court has ruled on the motion to correct illegal sentence, the Court dismisses the petition for writ of mandamus as moot. See Farrior v. State, 343 So.3d 159, 160 (Fla. 1st DCA 2022) (dismissing petition for writ of mandamus as moot where trial court had ruled on pending pleading).

B.L. Thomas, Ray, and M.K. Thomas, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Williams v. State

Florida Court of Appeals, First District
Mar 22, 2023
358 So. 3d 818 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2023)
Case details for

Williams v. State

Case Details

Full title:Herman P. Williams Jr., Petitioner, v. State of Florida, Respondent.

Court:Florida Court of Appeals, First District

Date published: Mar 22, 2023

Citations

358 So. 3d 818 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2023)