From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. Sheperd

United States District Court, E.D. California
Sep 28, 2005
No. CIV S-04-2428 MCE DAD P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 28, 2005)

Opinion

No. CIV S-04-2428 MCE DAD P.

September 28, 2005


ORDER


Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On August 1, 2005, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fifteen days.

On August 22, 2005, petitioner was granted until September 12, 2005 to file objections. Petitioner has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 72-304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed August 1, 2005, are adopted in full;

2. Respondents' January 14, 2005 motion to dismiss is granted; and

3. This action is dismissed as untimely.


Summaries of

Williams v. Sheperd

United States District Court, E.D. California
Sep 28, 2005
No. CIV S-04-2428 MCE DAD P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 28, 2005)
Case details for

Williams v. Sheperd

Case Details

Full title:DENNIS EVERETT WILLIAMS, Petitioner, v. MARK SHEPERD, ET AL., Respondents

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Sep 28, 2005

Citations

No. CIV S-04-2428 MCE DAD P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 28, 2005)

Citing Cases

Kirk v. Felker

Respondent also notes Cousin v. Lensing, 310 F.3d 843, 848-849 (5th Cir. 2002), where there was no equitable…