From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. Potter

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Jan 29, 2008
Civil Action No. 07-02 (W.D. Pa. Jan. 29, 2008)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 07-02.

January 29, 2008


ORDER


AND NOW, this 29th day of Jan, 2008, after the plaintiff filed an action in the above-captioned case, and after the defendant submitted a motion for summary judgment, and after a Report and Recommendation was issued by the United States Magistrate Judge, and the parties were granted thirteen days after being served with a copy to file written objections thereto, and no objections having been filed, and after independent review of the pleadings, and the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, which is adopted as the opinion of this Court,

IT IS ORDERED that the defendant's motion for summary judgment (Document No. 19) is granted.


Summaries of

Williams v. Potter

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Jan 29, 2008
Civil Action No. 07-02 (W.D. Pa. Jan. 29, 2008)
Case details for

Williams v. Potter

Case Details

Full title:VAUGHAN T. WILLIAMS, Plaintiff, v. JOHN E. POTTER, Postmaster General…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Jan 29, 2008

Citations

Civil Action No. 07-02 (W.D. Pa. Jan. 29, 2008)

Citing Cases

Sawa v. RDG-GCS Joint Ventures III

Plaintiffs cannot establish that Defendants' LNRR is pretextual simply because others who committed different…

Saellam v. Norfolk Southern Corporation

Although "similarly situated" does not mean "identically situated," the plaintiff generally must demonstrate…