From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. Platt

United States District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Jan 18, 2006
Case Number CIV-03-281-C (W.D. Okla. Jan. 18, 2006)

Summary

concluding that " preliminary injunction would be inappropriate to address wrongs wholly unrelated to the complaint"

Summary of this case from Williams v. Wingard

Opinion

Case Number CIV-03-281-C.

January 18, 2006


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION


On October 24, 2005, Magistrate Judge Robert E. Bacharach entered a Report and Recommendation urging dismissal of Plaintiff's request for a temporary restraining order and denial of Plaintiff's request for a preliminary injunction. Plaintiff was advised of his right to object on or before November 14, 2005. Within that time period Plaintiff sought and was granted an extension which made his objection due not later than December 23, 2005. As of the date of this Order, no such objection has been filed. Accordingly, the Court adopts in its entirety the thorough and well-reasoned Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 224) of the Magistrate Judge, DISMISSES Plaintiff's request for a temporary restraining order, and DENIES his request for a preliminary injunction.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Williams v. Platt

United States District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Jan 18, 2006
Case Number CIV-03-281-C (W.D. Okla. Jan. 18, 2006)

concluding that " preliminary injunction would be inappropriate to address wrongs wholly unrelated to the complaint"

Summary of this case from Williams v. Wingard

concluding that " preliminary injunction would be inappropriate to address wrongs wholly unrelated to the complaint"

Summary of this case from Watson v. Fisher

concluding that a preliminary injunction "would be inappropriate to address wrongs wholly unrelated to the complaint"

Summary of this case from Miller v. Berdanier

concluding that " preliminary injunction would be inappropriate to address wrongs wholly unrelated to the complaint"

Summary of this case from Payne v. Zavada

concluding that " preliminary injunction would be inappropriate to address wrongs wholly unrelated to the complaint"

Summary of this case from Payne v. Zavada

concluding that " preliminary injunction would be inappropriate to address wrongs wholly unrelated to the complaint"

Summary of this case from Williamson v. Roberts

concluding that " preliminary injunction would be inappropriate to address wrongs wholly unrelated to the complaint"

Summary of this case from Matthews v. Beard

concluding that " preliminary injunction would be inappropriate to address wrongs wholly unrelated to the complaint"

Summary of this case from Knight v. Murphy

concluding that a preliminary injunction would be inappropriate to address wrongs wholly unrelated to the complaint".

Summary of this case from Carpenter v. Kloptoski
Case details for

Williams v. Platt

Case Details

Full title:MILTON VERAN WILLIAMS, Plaintiff, v. CRAIG PLATT, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Oklahoma

Date published: Jan 18, 2006

Citations

Case Number CIV-03-281-C (W.D. Okla. Jan. 18, 2006)

Citing Cases

Crawford v. While

Plaintiff's request will therefore be denied."); Westbank Yellow Pages v. BRI, Inc., Civ. No. 96-1128, 1996…

Banks v. Good

Westbank Yellow Pages v. BRI, Inc., Civ. No. 96-1128, 1996 WL 255912, *1, (E.D. La. May 13, 1996)("A…