From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. Ouachita Parish Sheriff's Dep't

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA MONROE DIVISION
Oct 2, 2017
CIVIL ACTION NO. 17-0060 (W.D. La. Oct. 2, 2017)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 17-0060

10-02-2017

DANIEL LAMAR WILLIAMS v. OUACHITA PARISH SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, ET AL.


MAG. JUDGE KAREN L. HAYES

JUDGMENT

The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge having been considered, together with the written objections thereto filed with this Court, and, after a de novo review of the record, finding that the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation is correct,

IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that the motion to dismiss [Doc. No. 10] filed by Defendants Ouachita Parish Sheriff Jay Russell and Deputies Justin Cromwell, Seth Cox, and Brooke Boney, is GRANTED, and that Plaintiff's federal law claims against said Defendants and all claims against Defendant Ouachita Parish Sheriff's Department are hereby DISMISSED, WITH PREJUDICE.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Plaintiff's remaining state law claims against Ouachita Parish Sheriff Jay Russell and Deputies Justin Cromwell, Seth Cox, and Brooke Boney, plus all claims against defendant, XYZ Insurance Company, are hereby DISMISSED, WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

MONROE, LOUISIANA, this 2nd day of October, 2017.

/s/ _________

ROBERT G. JAMES

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Williams v. Ouachita Parish Sheriff's Dep't

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA MONROE DIVISION
Oct 2, 2017
CIVIL ACTION NO. 17-0060 (W.D. La. Oct. 2, 2017)
Case details for

Williams v. Ouachita Parish Sheriff's Dep't

Case Details

Full title:DANIEL LAMAR WILLIAMS v. OUACHITA PARISH SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, ET AL.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA MONROE DIVISION

Date published: Oct 2, 2017

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 17-0060 (W.D. La. Oct. 2, 2017)

Citing Cases

White v. Fuqua

It is well settled that a sheriff's department or office is not a juridical person with the capacity to be…

Monroe v. Conner

In this case, the Court “observes that interpretation and application of Louisiana's various prescriptive…