From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. Kijakazi

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Mar 16, 2022
20 CIVIL 8469 (JLC) (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 16, 2022)

Opinion

20 CIVIL 8469 (JLC)

03-16-2022

SHANA WILLIAMS, Plaintiff, v. KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Commissioner, Social Security Administration, Defendant.


JUDGMENT

It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Opinion and Order dated March 16, 2022, Williams' motion for judgment on the pleadings is granted, the Commissioner's cross-motion is denied, and the case is remanded pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). On remand, the ALJ should (1) obtain a functional assessment from Williams' treating providers; (2) obtain a functional assessment from Williams' treating psychiatrist, Dr. Vilor Shpitalnik; (3) assess Williams' RFC in light of any additional findings of her physical and mental impairments; (4) if needed, submit additional hypotheticals mirroring Williams RFC to the vocational expert; and (5) consider whether Williams may qualify for a "closed period" of disability. 1


Summaries of

Williams v. Kijakazi

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Mar 16, 2022
20 CIVIL 8469 (JLC) (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 16, 2022)
Case details for

Williams v. Kijakazi

Case Details

Full title:SHANA WILLIAMS, Plaintiff, v. KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Commissioner, Social…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Mar 16, 2022

Citations

20 CIVIL 8469 (JLC) (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 16, 2022)

Citing Cases

Juarez v. Kijakazi

(See Comm'r Mem. at 16.) However, the Court finds that there was a gap in the record that the ALJ should have…

Rodriguez v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

An ALJ “should consider not only whether Plaintiff was disabled at the time of the hearing, but also whether…