From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. Hooper

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA LAKE CHARLES DIVISION
Jul 23, 2019
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:19-cv-0198 (W.D. La. Jul. 23, 2019)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:19-cv-0198

07-23-2019

WILBERT WILLIAMS, IV v. TIMOTHY HOOPER


JUDGE JAMES D. CAIN, JR.

MAGISTRATE JUDGE KAY

JUDGMENT

For the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation [doc. 10] of the Magistrate Judge previously filed herein, determining that the findings are correct under the applicable law, and noting the lack of objections to the Report and Recommendation in the record;

IT IS ORDERED that the instant petition be DENIED and DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as untimely, under Rule 4 of the Rules Governing § 2254 Proceedings in the United States District Courts.

THUS DONE AND SIGNED in Chambers this 23 day of July, 2019.

/s/ _________

JAMES D. CAIN, JR.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Williams v. Hooper

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA LAKE CHARLES DIVISION
Jul 23, 2019
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:19-cv-0198 (W.D. La. Jul. 23, 2019)
Case details for

Williams v. Hooper

Case Details

Full title:WILBERT WILLIAMS, IV v. TIMOTHY HOOPER

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA LAKE CHARLES DIVISION

Date published: Jul 23, 2019

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:19-cv-0198 (W.D. La. Jul. 23, 2019)

Citing Cases

Schaefer v. Dir., TDCJ-CID

(rejecting petitioner's argument that his mental illness justified equitable tolling of the AEDPA's statute…