From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. Hobbs

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION
Feb 20, 2013
No. 5:11CV00238 JLH/JTR (E.D. Ark. Feb. 20, 2013)

Opinion

No. 5:11CV00238 JLH/JTR

02-20-2013

MARK WILLIAMS ADC #141529 PETITIONER v. RAY HOBBS, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction RESPONDENT


ORDER

The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray. No objections have been filed. After careful review, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects. Judgment will be entered accordingly.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Motion to Stay (docket entry #20) is DENIED, and the Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus (docket entry #2) is DISMISSED, WITH PREJUDICE. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT a Certificate of Appealability is DENIED pursuant to Rule 11(a) of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases.

_______________

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Williams v. Hobbs

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION
Feb 20, 2013
No. 5:11CV00238 JLH/JTR (E.D. Ark. Feb. 20, 2013)
Case details for

Williams v. Hobbs

Case Details

Full title:MARK WILLIAMS ADC #141529 PETITIONER v. RAY HOBBS, Director, Arkansas…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION

Date published: Feb 20, 2013

Citations

No. 5:11CV00238 JLH/JTR (E.D. Ark. Feb. 20, 2013)