From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. Gunn

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Jun 19, 1973
279 So. 2d 69 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1973)

Opinion

No. S-33.

June 19, 1973.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Liberty County, Ben C. Willis, J.

Roderic G. Magie of Levin, Warfield, Graff, Mabie Rosenbloum, Pensacola, for appellants.

No appearance for appellees.


Appellants herein seek review of the trial court's order finally disposing of the sale proceeds in a quiet title and partition action and denying appellants' motion for an extension of time for final disposition.

The matter of granting or denying motions to extend times for hearings or motions for a continuance is one which rests primarily in the judicial discretion of the trial judge. A gross or flagrant abuse of such judicial discretion must be adequately demonstrated by the complaining party before this Court will undertake to substitute its judgment for that of the presiding judge below. In view of the fact that this case has been stretched out in time for a period of almost three years and appellants waited until just before, three days in fact, the matter was brought on for final disposition before asking for a continuance, we do not believe that the trial court abused its discretion in denying the motion for extension of time.

Appellants having failed to demonstrate reversible error in the proceedings below, the order appealed herein is accordingly affirmed.

SPECTOR, C.J., and RAWLS, J., concur.


Summaries of

Williams v. Gunn

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Jun 19, 1973
279 So. 2d 69 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1973)
Case details for

Williams v. Gunn

Case Details

Full title:ZEKE WILLIAMS ET UX., APPELLANTS, v. EDNA GUNN ET AL., ETC., APPELLEES

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Jun 19, 1973

Citations

279 So. 2d 69 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1973)

Citing Cases

Thompson v. General Motors Corp.

The trial court has broad discretion in granting or denying a continuance. Edwards v. Pratt, 335 So.2d 597…

Taylor v. Mazda Motor of America

I. The standard of review for the denial of a motion for continuance is abuse of discretion. Williams v.…