From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. Giddens

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Mar 25, 1986
485 So. 2d 493 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)

Opinion

No. 85-2324.

March 25, 1986.

An Appeal of a non-final order from the Circuit Court for Dade County; William E. Gladstone, Judge.

Melvin A. Rubin, Miami, for appellant.

No appearance for appellee.

Before BARKDULL, FERGUSON and JORGENSON, JJ.


We affirm the trial court order which requires both parties and the child to submit to a Human Leukocyte Antigen (HLA) typing blood test but disapprove of that portion of the order which states that the test shall be dispositive of paternity. This case is substantially the same as, and is controlled by, Joyner v. Hair, 485 So.2d 491 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986).

We remand the cause to the trial court to strike that portion of the order which states that the test shall be dispositive. The parties should be given the opportunity to present any other evidence which is relevant and material to the issue of paternity.

Affirmed and remanded with directions.


Summaries of

Williams v. Giddens

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Mar 25, 1986
485 So. 2d 493 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)
Case details for

Williams v. Giddens

Case Details

Full title:CHRISTINE WILLIAMS, APPELLANT, v. HERBERT E. GIDDENS, SR., APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Mar 25, 1986

Citations

485 So. 2d 493 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)

Citing Cases

White v. State

"In determining the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the conviction, this Court must accept as true the…

Debardelaben v. Price

"'In determining the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the conviction, this Court must accept as true…