From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. Forrest City Med. Ctr.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS EASTERN DIVISION
Dec 11, 2012
CASE NO. 2:12CV00060 BSM/HDY (E.D. Ark. Dec. 11, 2012)

Opinion

CASE NO. 2:12CV00060 BSM/HDY

12-11-2012

HENRY A. WILLIAMS REG #19967-076 PLAINTIFF v. FORREST CITY MEDICAL CENTER et al. DEFENDANTS


ORDER

The proposed findings and recommended disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge H. David Young [Doc. No. 11] and the filed objection [Doc. No. 12] have been reviewed. After carefully considering these documents and making a de novo review of the record, it is concluded that the proposed findings and recommended disposition should be, and hereby are, rejected in their entirety in all respects.

Plaintiff Henry A. Williams is permitted to amend his complaint as requested in his objection [Doc. No. 12]. Because Williams has already been granted leave to amend his complaint once, this will be the last time that his request to amend will be granted. See [Doc. No. 6].

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that:

Plaintiff Henry A. Williams's request to amend his complaint [Doc. No. 12] is granted and he shall have 30 days from the date of this order to file an amended complaint.

_______________

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Williams v. Forrest City Med. Ctr.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS EASTERN DIVISION
Dec 11, 2012
CASE NO. 2:12CV00060 BSM/HDY (E.D. Ark. Dec. 11, 2012)
Case details for

Williams v. Forrest City Med. Ctr.

Case Details

Full title:HENRY A. WILLIAMS REG #19967-076 PLAINTIFF v. FORREST CITY MEDICAL CENTER…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS EASTERN DIVISION

Date published: Dec 11, 2012

Citations

CASE NO. 2:12CV00060 BSM/HDY (E.D. Ark. Dec. 11, 2012)