From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. Fazil Azeem

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 26, 2009
62 A.D.3d 988 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)

Opinion

No. 2008-04388.

May 26, 2009.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Nelson, J.), dated April 29, 2008, which granted the defendants' motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ginsberg Broome, P.C., New York, N.Y. (Robert M. Ginsberg of counsel), for appellant.

Newman and Newman, LLP, Jamaica, N.Y. (Erwin B. Newman of counsel), for respondents.

Before: Mastro, J.P., Skelos, Dickerson and Lott, JJ., concur.


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiff's decedent allegedly tripped and fell over a raised water valve cap in a public sidewalk abutting the defendants' premises. The defendants established their entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by demonstrating that they did not negligently construct or repair the sidewalk, otherwise cause the defective condition, cause the defect to occur by some special use of the sidewalk, or breach a specific ordinance or statute which obligated the occupant to maintain the sidewalk ( see Hausser v Giunta, 88 NY2d 449, 452-453; Biondi v County of Nassau, 49 AD3d 580; Jacobs v Village of Rockville Ctr., 41 AD3d 539). In opposition, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact as to whether, inter alia, the defendants made special use of the sidewalk ( see Noia v Maselli, 45 AD3d 746).

The plaintiff's remaining contention is without merit.


Summaries of

Williams v. Fazil Azeem

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 26, 2009
62 A.D.3d 988 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
Case details for

Williams v. Fazil Azeem

Case Details

Full title:SHARON WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. FAZIL AZEEM et al., Respondents

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 26, 2009

Citations

62 A.D.3d 988 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
2009 N.Y. Slip Op. 4228
883 N.Y.S.2d 533

Citing Cases

Klau v. Keyspan Gas E. Corp.

Significantly, the foregoing statutory construction argument did not require the Court to attribute…

Scuteri v. 7318 13th Ave. Corp.

Thus, a commercial tenant at the property herein would only be a proper party if it actually created the…