Summary
noting that "the Court examines the ALJ's decision to see if it clearly demonstrates that he considered the [borderline age] issue" and finds remand required where "there is simply no indication in the decision that the ALJ was aware that a borderline situation existed."
Summary of this case from Schirg v. ColvinOpinion
No. CV 12-3974 FFM
05-16-2013
JANIS L. WILLIAMS, Plaintiff, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.
JUDGMENT OF REMAND
The Court having entered an Order pursuant to Sentence 4 of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the above-captioned action is remanded to the Commissioner of Social Security for further proceedings consistent with the Order dated May 16, 2013
________________
FREDERICK F. MUMM
United States Magistrate Judge