From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. Cnty. of L. A.

United States District Court, Central District of California
Jan 21, 2023
CV 22-5798 PA (ASx) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 21, 2023)

Opinion

CV 22-5798 PA (ASx)

01-21-2023

MARIE WILLIAMS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, et al., Defendants.


JUDGMENT

PERCY ANDERSON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

In accordance with the Court's January 21, 2023 Minute Order granting the Motion to Dismiss filed by defendant County of Los Angeles (“Defendant”) and dismissing plaintiffs Marie Williams, Anthony Williams, Daniel McClanaham, and Russell Williams, Sr., acting individually and as personal representatives of the Estate of Russell Williams (“Plaintiffs”), First Amended Complaint, and the Court's January 19, 2023 Minute Order dismissing the remaining Doe defendants, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Plaintiffs' claims against Defendant and brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 are dismissed with prejudice.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiffs' state law causes of action and that those causes of action are dismissed without prejudice.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Plaintiffs take nothing and Defendant shall have its costs of suit.


Summaries of

Williams v. Cnty. of L. A.

United States District Court, Central District of California
Jan 21, 2023
CV 22-5798 PA (ASx) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 21, 2023)
Case details for

Williams v. Cnty. of L. A.

Case Details

Full title:MARIE WILLIAMS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Jan 21, 2023

Citations

CV 22-5798 PA (ASx) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 21, 2023)

Citing Cases

Leibel v. Gregory

Braunstein v. Villani, No. 3:12-CV-00665-MMD, 2013 WL 1003627, at *2 (D. Nev. Mar. 12, 2013) (denying…