From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 4, 1993
191 A.D.2d 217 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)

Opinion

March 4, 1993

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Lewis R. Friedman, J.).


The IAS Court did not abuse its discretion in consolidating these actions for negligent street maintenance and medical malpractice, the malpractice action alleging aggravation of the injury alleged in the negligence action (see, Gomez v. New York City Hous. Auth., 161 A.D.2d 190). The issues of negligence and deviation from proper medical care are not so complex as to be confusing to a jury; thus we perceive no risk of prejudice to the only defendant in the malpractice action who objects to consolidation (compare, C.K.S. Ice Cream Co. v. Frusen Gladje Franchise, 172 A.D.2d 206, 208-209), and no material witnesses will be inconvenienced by a trial in Bronx County, the situs of the accident and the courthouse nearest to where all medical treatment was received.

Concur — Sullivan, J.P., Wallach, Kupferman, Kassal and Rubin, JJ.


Summaries of

Williams v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 4, 1993
191 A.D.2d 217 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
Case details for

Williams v. City of New York

Case Details

Full title:DEREK WILLIAMS, Respondent, v. CITY OF NEW YORK et al., Defendants, and…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Mar 4, 1993

Citations

191 A.D.2d 217 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
594 N.Y.S.2d 200

Citing Cases

Vanderzalm v. Sechrist Indus., Inc.

Although the Court cannot predict whether the State Malpractice Action and the instant case will be…

Lopez v. N.Y.C. Health & Hosps. Corp.

re has been no demonstration that consolidation may complicate or prejudice plaintiff's right to a fair trial…