From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. City of Austin

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
Aug 7, 2014
NO. 03-14-00123-CV (Tex. App. Aug. 7, 2014)

Opinion

NO. 03-14-00123-CV

08-07-2014

Blayne Williams, Appellant v. City of Austin, Appellee


FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 345TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT
NO. D-1-GN-12-003127, HONORABLE TIM SULAK, JUDGE PRESIDING
MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant Blayne Williams's brief was due on April 25, 2014, but this Court granted Williams's motion to extend time to file brief until June 24, 2014. On July 1, 2014, the Clerk of this Court sent notice to Williams that appellant's brief was due on June 24, 2014, and that it was overdue. The Clerk requested a response by July 11, 2014, and notified Williams that the appeal would be dismissed for want of prosecution if Williams did not respond to this Court by that date. Williams has not filed his brief or otherwise responded. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b), (c).

/s/_________

Melissa Goodwin, Justice
Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Rose and Goodwin Dismissed for Want of Prosecution Filed: August 7, 2014


Summaries of

Williams v. City of Austin

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
Aug 7, 2014
NO. 03-14-00123-CV (Tex. App. Aug. 7, 2014)
Case details for

Williams v. City of Austin

Case Details

Full title:Blayne Williams, Appellant v. City of Austin, Appellee

Court:TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

Date published: Aug 7, 2014

Citations

NO. 03-14-00123-CV (Tex. App. Aug. 7, 2014)