From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. Church

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 13, 2008
49 A.D.3d 386 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)

Opinion

No. 3084.

March 13, 2008.

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Sallie Manzanet-Daniels, J.), entered on or about September 24, 2007, which, in an action for personal injuries sustained when a parking lot gate that plaintiff, a security guard at defendant's premises, was attempting to close derailed from the track on which it slid and fell, granted defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Goldberg Carlton, PLLC, New York (Gary M. Carlton of counsel), for appellant.

The Law Office of Vincent D. McNamara, East Norwich (Anthony Marino of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Saxe, J.P., Gonzalez, Buckley and Acosta, JJ.


Defendant established its prima facie entitlement to summary judgment with the deposition testimony of its building superintendent that he closed the gate everyday as part of his job duties, and, other than a jammed lock repaired some three months before the accident, never had any problems with the gate or received any complaints about it ( see Marszalkiewicz v Waterside Plaza, LLC, 35 AD3d 176, 177). No issues of fact as to constructive notice were raised by the affidavit of plaintiffs expert that the deteriorated and unsafe condition of the bottom rail and vertical support stop were clearly indicated by extensive rust ( Garcia v Northcrest Apts. Corp., 24 AD3d 208, 209 [appearance of rust insufficient by itself to raise issue of fact as to constructive notice of a defect in one of the supporting poles of a chain-link fence]).


Summaries of

Williams v. Church

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 13, 2008
49 A.D.3d 386 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
Case details for

Williams v. Church

Case Details

Full title:MARSHALL WILLIAMS, JR., Appellant, v. CHURCH HOME ASSOCIATES, L.P.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Mar 13, 2008

Citations

49 A.D.3d 386 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
2008 N.Y. Slip Op. 2217
854 N.Y.S.2d 357

Citing Cases

Serna v. 898 Corp.

Mr. Fein does not assert that he ever actually visited the site of the accident or that he inspected or…

Selfo v. Celenza

Thus, Ms. Selfo's punitive damages claims must be, and hereby are, dismissed. It should be noted that Ms.…