From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams v. Adventure Holdings, L.L.C.

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
Apr 22, 2014
No. 05-12-01610-CV (Tex. App. Apr. 22, 2014)

Summary

finding an escalator did not pose an unreasonable risk of harm in the absence of evidence of prior injuries, defective or unusual construction, inherently dangerous or hazardous placement, or noncompliance with applicable standards

Summary of this case from Jones v. Dollar Tree Stores

Opinion

No. 05-12-01610-CV

04-22-2014

SHENITRA WILLIAMS, INDIVIDUALLY, AND AS NEXT FRIEND OF R.W., III, A MINOR, Appellant v. ADVENTURE HOLDINGS, L.L.C., D/B/A AMAZING JAKES, Appellee


On Appeal from the 219th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 219-03596-2011


ORDER

Before the Court is appellee Adventure Holdings, L.L.C., d/b/a Amazing Jakes's April 3, 2013 motion to dismiss the appeal, which was included in its brief.

The Court DENIES appellee Adventure Holdings, L.L.C., d/b/a Amazing Jakes's April 3, 2013 motion to dismiss the appeal.

DOUGLAS S. LANG

JUSTICE


Summaries of

Williams v. Adventure Holdings, L.L.C.

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
Apr 22, 2014
No. 05-12-01610-CV (Tex. App. Apr. 22, 2014)

finding an escalator did not pose an unreasonable risk of harm in the absence of evidence of prior injuries, defective or unusual construction, inherently dangerous or hazardous placement, or noncompliance with applicable standards

Summary of this case from Jones v. Dollar Tree Stores
Case details for

Williams v. Adventure Holdings, L.L.C.

Case Details

Full title:SHENITRA WILLIAMS, INDIVIDUALLY, AND AS NEXT FRIEND OF R.W., III, A MINOR…

Court:Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

Date published: Apr 22, 2014

Citations

No. 05-12-01610-CV (Tex. App. Apr. 22, 2014)

Citing Cases

Shoemaker v. Kohl's Dep't Stores, Inc.

We have applied this rule in other premises liability cases. See, e.g., Warren v. Carlson Restaurants, Inc.,…

Martin-de-Nicolas v. AAA Tex. Cnty. Mut. Ins. Co.

In other words, AAA asserted that it was entitled to summary judgment, as a matter of law, because the terms…