From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Williams Cos. v. Wolosky

Supreme Court of Delaware.
Nov 3, 2021
264 A.3d 641 (Del. 2021)

Summary

holding an inequitable shareholder rights plan unenforceable

Summary of this case from Kellner v. AIM ImmunoTech.

Opinion

No. 139, 2021

11-03-2021

The WILLIAMS COMPANIES, INC., Alan S. Armstrong, Stephen W. Bergstrom, Nancy K. Buese, Stephen I. Chazen, Charles I. Cogut, Michael A. Creel, Vicki L. Fuller, Peter A. Ragauss, Scott D. Shefield, Murray D. Smith, William H. Spence, and Computershare Trust Company, N.A., Defendants Below, Appellants, v. Stephen WOLOSKY and City of St. Clair Shores Police & Fire Retirement System, Plaintiffs Below, Appellees.



AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Williams Cos. v. Wolosky

Supreme Court of Delaware.
Nov 3, 2021
264 A.3d 641 (Del. 2021)

holding an inequitable shareholder rights plan unenforceable

Summary of this case from Kellner v. AIM ImmunoTech.
Case details for

Williams Cos. v. Wolosky

Case Details

Full title:The WILLIAMS COMPANIES, INC., Alan S. Armstrong, Stephen W. Bergstrom…

Court:Supreme Court of Delaware.

Date published: Nov 3, 2021

Citations

264 A.3d 641 (Del. 2021)

Citing Cases

Teamsters Local 677 Health Servs. & Ins. Plan v. Martell

("Activists may pressure a corporation to make management changes, implement operational improvements, or…

Kellner v. AIM ImmunoTech.

In each of the decisions cited, the reviewing court either held the bylaw unenforceable, not invalid or void…