From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

William M. v. Elba Q.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Oct 14, 2014
121 A.D.3d 489 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)

Opinion

2014-10-14

In re WILLIAM M., Petitioner–Respondent, v. ELBA Q., Respondent–Appellant.

Tennille M. Tatum–Evans, New York, for appellant.


Affirmed.

Tennille M. Tatum–Evans, New York, for appellant. FRIEDMAN, J.P., MOSKOWITZ, FEINMAN, GISCHE, KAPNICK, JJ.

Order of protection, Family Court, New York County (Susan R. Larabee, J.), entered on or about May 2, 2012, against respondent, after a fact-finding determination that respondent committed the family offenses of harassment in the second degree, menacing in the third degree, and disorderly conduct, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

A fair preponderance of the evidence supports Family Court's finding that respondent committed the offenses of harassment in the second degree, menacing in the third degree, and disorderly conduct ( see Family Court Act § 832). Petitioner's testimony that respondent attempted to stab him with a knife pulled from her coat pocket, causing him to become afraid and run away, supports the court's determination that respondent committed harassment in the second degree and menacing in the third degree (Family Court Act § 821[1]; Penal Law §§ 120.15; 240.26[1]; Matter of Tamara A. v. Anthony Wayne S., 110 A.D.3d 560, 974 N.Y.S.2d 48 [1st Dept.2013]; Matter of Denzel F., 44 A.D.3d 389, 390, 843 N.Y.S.2d 60 [1st Dept.2007] ). Moreover, petitioner testified that respondent wielded the knife in the stairwell of an apartment building and that on another occasion, while petitioner and his son were standing outside their apartment building, respondent shouted obscenities at the son from a sixth-floor window, which supports the court's determination that respondent committed the family offense of disorderly conduct (Penal Law §§ 240.20[1]; 240.20[3]; see e.g. Matter of Miriam M. v. Warren M., 51 A.D.3d 581, 859 N.Y.S.2d 66 [1st Dept.2008]; see also Tamara A. v. Anthony Wayne S., 110 A.D.3d at 560, 974 N.Y.S.2d 48).

We find no basis for disturbing the court's determination crediting petitioner's version of events over respondent's version ( see Matter of Peter G. v. Karleen K., 51 A.D.3d 541, 856 N.Y.S.2d 859 [1st Dept.2008] ).


Summaries of

William M. v. Elba Q.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Oct 14, 2014
121 A.D.3d 489 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
Case details for

William M. v. Elba Q.

Case Details

Full title:In re WILLIAM M., Petitioner–Respondent, v. ELBA Q., Respondent–Appellant.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Oct 14, 2014

Citations

121 A.D.3d 489 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
121 A.D.3d 489
2014 N.Y. Slip Op. 6901

Citing Cases

Atiya D.K. v. Curtis J.C.

Petitioner testified that respondent confronted her in the vestibule of her apartment building, in the…

Yenis C. v. Daniel R.

There is no basis to disturb the Referee's credibility determinations (see Matter of Everett C. v. Oneida P.,…