From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

William G. v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

United States District Court, Southern District of Ohio
Nov 7, 2022
2:22-cv-213 (S.D. Ohio Nov. 7, 2022)

Opinion

2:22-cv-213

11-07-2022

William G., Plaintiff, v. Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.


Jolson, Magistrate Judge.

ORDER

JAMES L. GRAHAM, United States District Judge.

This matter is before the Court for consideration of the June 30, 2022 report and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §636(b). The Magistrate Judge recommended that the Commissioner of Social Security's nondisability finding be reversed and that this case be remanded to the Commissioner and Administrative Law Judge under Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).

The report and recommendation specifically advised the parties that failure to object to the report and recommendation within fourteen days of the report would result in a waiver of the right to have the district judge review the report and recommendation de novo and a waiver of the right to appeal the decision of the district court adopting the report and recommendation. The time period for filing objections to the report and recommendation has expired, and no party has objected to the report and recommendation.

The Court agrees with the report and recommendation (Doc. 12), and it is hereby adopted. The decision of the Commissioner is REVERSED, and this action is REMANDED to the Commissioner and Administrative Law Judge under Sentence Four of § 405(g).


Summaries of

William G. v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

United States District Court, Southern District of Ohio
Nov 7, 2022
2:22-cv-213 (S.D. Ohio Nov. 7, 2022)
Case details for

William G. v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

Case Details

Full title:William G., Plaintiff, v. Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Southern District of Ohio

Date published: Nov 7, 2022

Citations

2:22-cv-213 (S.D. Ohio Nov. 7, 2022)

Citing Cases

Laura M. v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

An explicit discussion allows Plaintiff to understand how the ALJ reached her ultimate decision.” William G.…

Kevin D. v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

(“When evaluating consistency, the Undersigned looks to the ALJ's . . . discussion of the record elsewhere in…