From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

William Cortes v. Hartford Accident and Indem. Co.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Nov 6, 1958
14 Misc. 2d 1062 (N.Y. App. Term 1958)

Opinion

November 6, 1958

Appeal from the Municipal Court of the City of New York, Borough of Manhattan, MARIO G. DI PIRRO, J.

Harold Schaffner and Joseph L. Schilling for appellant.

William J. Williams for respondents.


Notice of the accident to the insurance broker was not notice to the insurance carrier, defendant here. (See Allen v. German American Ins. Co., 123 N.Y. 6.) The insurance policy defendant issued to Alvarez, its insured, required written notice of an accident to be given to the company as soon as practicable. Since the record fails to disclose a reasonable explanation or an adequate excuse, a delay of 58 days before written notice was given defendant is untimely and unreasonable as a matter of law, and not a fulfillment of the condition of the policy. (See Vanderbilt v. Indemnity Ins. Co., 265 App. Div. 495. )

The judgment should be reversed, with $30 costs, and judgment directed in favor of defendant dismissing the complaint on the merits, with costs.

Concur — HOFSTADTER, J.P., AURELIO and TILZER, JJ.

Judgment reversed, etc.


Summaries of

William Cortes v. Hartford Accident and Indem. Co.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Nov 6, 1958
14 Misc. 2d 1062 (N.Y. App. Term 1958)
Case details for

William Cortes v. Hartford Accident and Indem. Co.

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM CORTES et al., Respondents, v. HARTFORD ACCIDENT AND INDEMNITY…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department

Date published: Nov 6, 1958

Citations

14 Misc. 2d 1062 (N.Y. App. Term 1958)
180 N.Y.S.2d 102

Citing Cases

Warren v. Merchants Mutual Insurance Company

Order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated August 31, 1966, reversed, without costs, and…

Curreri v. Allstate Ins. Co.

As a consequence, notice to the broker was not due notice to the carrier under the terms of the policy or the…