From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wilkins v. Bozzuto Associates, Inc.

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Dec 10, 2009
CIVIL NO. 09-2581 (E.D. Pa. Dec. 10, 2009)

Summary

denying plaintiff leave to amend his race discrimination claim on the grounds that "[p]laintiff does not record one incident in which employees of other races were treated differently, or an occasion in which his new supervisor expressed or displayed racial bias"

Summary of this case from Douglas v. Nesbit

Opinion

CIVIL NO. 09-2581.

December 10, 2009


ORDER


AND NOW, this 10th day of December, 2009, upon consideration of Defendant's July 2, 2009 Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint [Doc. No. 5], Plaintiff's Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss [Doc. No. 6], and Defendant's Reply to Opposition to Motion to Dismiss [Doc. No. 10], it is hereby ORDERED that:

1) Defendant's July 2, 2009 Motion to Dismiss [Doc. No. 5] is GRANTED for the reasons stated in the attached Memorandum Opinion. The above-captioned matter is DISMISSED without prejudice.

2) Defendant's June 15, 2009 Motion to Dismiss [Doc. No. 3] is DISMISSED as MOOT.

It is so ORDERED.


Summaries of

Wilkins v. Bozzuto Associates, Inc.

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Dec 10, 2009
CIVIL NO. 09-2581 (E.D. Pa. Dec. 10, 2009)

denying plaintiff leave to amend his race discrimination claim on the grounds that "[p]laintiff does not record one incident in which employees of other races were treated differently, or an occasion in which his new supervisor expressed or displayed racial bias"

Summary of this case from Douglas v. Nesbit

In Wilkins v. Bozzuto & Assocs., Inc., Civil No. 09-2581, 2009 WL 4756381 (E.D. Pa Dec. 10, 2009), the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania dismissed a complaint alleging racial discrimination for similar reasons.

Summary of this case from Miller v. Del. Technical & Cmty. Coll.

dismissing plaintiff's section 1981 claim where plaintiff did "not offer facts that suggest that he was treated differently in the performance of his employment contract than any individual of another race . . ."

Summary of this case from Deserne v. Madlyn Leonard Abramson Center

dismissing plaintiff's Section 1981 claim where plaintiff did "not offer facts that suggest that he was treated differently in the performance of his employment contract than any individual of another race. . . ."

Summary of this case from Deserne v. Madalyn Leonard Abramson Center
Case details for

Wilkins v. Bozzuto Associates, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:SHERMAN WILKINS, Plaintiff, v. BOZZUTO ASSOCIATES, INC., Defendant

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Dec 10, 2009

Citations

CIVIL NO. 09-2581 (E.D. Pa. Dec. 10, 2009)

Citing Cases

Wilkins v. Bozzuto & Assocs., Inc.

42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2, et seq.Wilkins v. Bozzuto & Assocs., Inc., No. 09-2581, 2009 WL 47566381, * 2 (E.D. Pa.…

Depelligrin v. A&L Motor Sales, LLC

A prima facie case of an employment discrimination claim grounded on Title VII requires that the plaintiff…