From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wilczak v. State Farm Mutual Auto. Ins. Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 10, 1978
65 A.D.2d 960 (N.Y. App. Div. 1978)

Opinion

November 10, 1978

Appeal from the Oneida Supreme Court.

Present — Moule, J.P., Cardamone, Simons, Dillon and Hancock, Jr., JJ.


Order unanimously affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: The court may always resettle its orders upon motion of a party, his attorney or sua sponte upon proper notice to all parties when the order does not accurately recite the decision of the court (see CPLR 5015; Matter of Samson, 60 A.D.2d 964; 2 Carmody-Wait 2d, N Y Prac, § 8:125 et seq.).


Summaries of

Wilczak v. State Farm Mutual Auto. Ins. Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 10, 1978
65 A.D.2d 960 (N.Y. App. Div. 1978)
Case details for

Wilczak v. State Farm Mutual Auto. Ins. Co.

Case Details

Full title:ROMAN J. WILCZAK, Respondent, v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Nov 10, 1978

Citations

65 A.D.2d 960 (N.Y. App. Div. 1978)

Citing Cases

Barakakos v. Avellini

Thereafter, the court properly exercised its discretion in sua sponte issuing the order appealed from, which…