From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wilcox v. Hausch

Supreme Court of California
Nov 1, 1880
57 Cal. 139 (Cal. 1880)

Opinion

         Department One

         Appeal from a judgment for the plaintiff, in the Thirteenth District Court, County of Tulare. Campbell, J.

         COUNSEL:

         John J. Williams, and W. C. Burnett, for Appellant.

          Bishop & Fifield, for Respondents.


         JUDGES: McKinstry, J., dissented. [Thornton, J., being disqualified, took no part in the decision.]

         OPINION

         In Bank.

         The Court:

         On the authority of the Board of Education v. Keenan , 55 Cal. 642, judgment and order of nonsuit reversed, and cause remanded for a new trial.


Summaries of

Wilcox v. Hausch

Supreme Court of California
Nov 1, 1880
57 Cal. 139 (Cal. 1880)
Case details for

Wilcox v. Hausch

Case Details

Full title:P. S. WILCOX v. C. HAUSCH et al.

Court:Supreme Court of California

Date published: Nov 1, 1880

Citations

57 Cal. 139 (Cal. 1880)

Citing Cases

Franklin v. Southern California Motor Road Co.

The motion for nonsuit was properly denied, as there was some evidence on all material points. (Ringgold v.…