Opinion
CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:09-CV-167 (MTT).
September 30, 2010
ORDER
This case is before the Court on the Recommendation (Doc. 16) of United States Magistrate Judge Thomas Q. Langstaff on the Plaintiff's Complaint (Doc. 1) seeking review, under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), of the Commissioner of Social Security's denial of the Plaintiff's application for Social Security disability benefits for lack of disability. The Magistrate Judge, having reviewed the case pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 and 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), recommends denying the Plaintiff's Complaint because the Commissioner's denial of benefits was supported by substantial evidence. The Plaintiff has objected to the Recommendation (Doc. 17) and the Court has thoroughly considered Petitioner's Objection and has made a de novo determination of the portions of the Recommendation to which Petitioner objects.
The Court accepts and adopts the findings, conclusions and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge. The Recommendation is adopted and made the order of this Court. The Complaint (Doc. 1) is DENIED.