From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wilborn v. Vermillion Parish P.J.

Supreme Court of Louisiana
Jul 2, 2004
877 So. 2d 985 (La. 2004)

Summary

In Wilborn, the supreme court summarily reinstated a judgment of the district court, which held a facsimile request for service received within ninety days was timely, even though the requirements of La. R.S. 13:850 had not been satisfied.

Summary of this case from Lathan Co. v. State

Opinion

No. 2004-CC-1074.

July 2, 2004.


Granted. La.R.S. 13:5107(D) provides that in suits against the state or a political subdivision, service of citation shall be requested within ninety days of the commencement of the action. Nothing in that statute requires that the request be filed with the court. The court of appeal's reliance on the fax-filing statute, La.R.S. 13:850, is misplaced, as that statute deals with the requirements for filing papers in civil actions. Accordingly, the judgment of the court of appeal is reversed and the judgment of the trial court is reinstated. The case is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings.


Summaries of

Wilborn v. Vermillion Parish P.J.

Supreme Court of Louisiana
Jul 2, 2004
877 So. 2d 985 (La. 2004)

In Wilborn, the supreme court summarily reinstated a judgment of the district court, which held a facsimile request for service received within ninety days was timely, even though the requirements of La. R.S. 13:850 had not been satisfied.

Summary of this case from Lathan Co. v. State

In Wilborn, the trial court concluded the plaintiffs' notice of service of their citation was satisfied under La.R.S. 13:5107(D), although they did not fully comply with the facsimile filing requirements set forth in La.R.S. 13:850.

Summary of this case from Tranchant v. State
Case details for

Wilborn v. Vermillion Parish P.J.

Case Details

Full title:MILLIE WILBORN, ET AL. v. VERMILLION PARISH POLICE JURY, ET AL

Court:Supreme Court of Louisiana

Date published: Jul 2, 2004

Citations

877 So. 2d 985 (La. 2004)

Citing Cases

Lathan Co. v. State

Therefore, the State maintained that Lathan's request for service was not timely, because Lathan's original…

Tranchant v. State

Nothing in La.R.S. 13:5107 D requires that a request for service be " filed with the court." Wilhorn v.…