From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wikkerink v. Mosely

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA SHREVEPORT DIVISION
Nov 29, 2016
CIVIL ACTION NO. 15-2700-P (W.D. La. Nov. 29, 2016)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 15-2700-P

11-29-2016

AARON DANEL WIKKERINK v. JUDGE MOSELY


MAGISTRATE JUDGE HORNSBY

JUDGMENT

For the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge previously filed herein, and after an independent review of the record, and noting the lack of written objections filed by Petitioner and determining that the findings are correct under the applicable law;

IT IS ORDERED that Petitioner's application for writ of habeas corpus is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to exhaust state court remedies.

Rule 11 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Proceedings for the U.S. District Courts requires the district court to issue or deny a certificate of appealability when it enters a final order adverse to the applicant. The court, after considering the record in this case and the standard set forth in 28 U.S.C. Section 2253, denies a certificate of appealability because the applicant has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.

THUS DONE AND SIGNED at Shreveport, Louisiana, on this the 29th day of November, 2016.

/s/_________

S. MAURICE HICKS, JR.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Wikkerink v. Mosely

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA SHREVEPORT DIVISION
Nov 29, 2016
CIVIL ACTION NO. 15-2700-P (W.D. La. Nov. 29, 2016)
Case details for

Wikkerink v. Mosely

Case Details

Full title:AARON DANEL WIKKERINK v. JUDGE MOSELY

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA SHREVEPORT DIVISION

Date published: Nov 29, 2016

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 15-2700-P (W.D. La. Nov. 29, 2016)