From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Widner v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
May 16, 1989
542 So. 2d 1068 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

Opinion

No. 88-972.

May 16, 1989.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Bay County; Don T. Sirmons, Judge.

Michael E. Allen, Public Defender, and Kathleen Stover, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

No appearance for appellee.


Widner has appealed from a sentence imposed after remand by this court in Widner v. State, 520 So.2d 676 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988). The sentence is affirmed, but the trial court erred in imposing court costs without notice under sections 960.20 and 943.25(4), Florida Statutes, as a condition of probation. Ayers v. State, 538 So.2d 545 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989). Consequently, we strike the cost provision without prejudice to the State to seek reassessment after proper notice to appellant. The sentence is in all other respects affirmed.

THOMPSON and ZEHMER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Widner v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
May 16, 1989
542 So. 2d 1068 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)
Case details for

Widner v. State

Case Details

Full title:EUGENE WIDNER, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: May 16, 1989

Citations

542 So. 2d 1068 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)